Remux vs 4k vs reddit. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a remux vs.
Remux vs 4k vs reddit And in general it is disappointing that we don’t see much of a difference in detail here. H265 is 18. Hope this helps you. Life action vs cartoon. The BluRay is the full disc, and the remux is made from that. Basically since remuxes with WEBDL DV metadata became a thing. SDR rip. I just want to know if the size of the 4K remux movies are worth it? It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. You might not be able to see a difference unless you’re really looking. 2160p WEB-DL > 1080p remux, imo. com) basically recommends bitrates of 20 Mbps or higher to get better than streaming quality but I've found that a lot of streaming movie content is at this level or slightly higher now. Busy content or not. 1080p remux could be anywhere from 15gb-40gb. But how different is that from a Web-DL as you'd think a direct download of a file would still be the best. My personal experience Remux will be purely movie and nothing shit. It still depends on the actual movie itself but that can cut your average 4k remux file size down about 30%. Edit: thanks for the input, everyone. a complete 1to1 ripped from a BluRay that hasn't been reencoded. The difference in quality, practically none. Not to mention that 1080p means I let my tv or shield pro do some form of artificial upscaling We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I'd recommend looking in your TV settings, if the brightness is too high this can be a reason on OLEDs. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS 4K HDR Blu Ray remux 43,6 GB vs 4K HDR 10+ BluRay rip 5,39 GB? For 4k remux movies, which will easily be 50GB+, there's only two things the speed difference will have an impact on: The time it takes for the drive to seek to that file (worst case, you'll have to wait an additional second for the movie to start playing) I just ordered an LG C2 and I want to get The Batman in 4K, as all those dark scenes should look amazing on the OLED panel. Disc > digital! Some torrented files are full 4K Bluray quality, others are compressed down. 264 vs. REMUX vs 10bit HDR rips I don’t know why but sometimes 4K remux like tenet looks bad quality. Oh yeah at that point it's very nice having uhd terminal releases usually around 25% the size of a uhd remux, and on my setup, not any appreciable difference while maintaining HDR/atmos. The encodes in the 25-35Mbps range are awesome to me. Should a buy a 4K Bluray player to read physical discs or keep using my apple tv 4k setup ? Just to know : I have an Apple TV 4k that I use to stream my content with infuse wia my plex library. Also keep in mind that sometimes files have to be encoded a certain way depending on the device you're playing back on (For example, playing back an mkv directly on an LG OLED requires DTS audio and Dolby Vision video to be remuxed to play correctly) I always prefer REMUXES over any encode, anyday. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. Very small sample size though. Blu-ray. That's what remux means. Works for me. a high quality encode. Top. Well the shield pro has better specs for sure, even though is more for gaming than streaming, I wish I could afford a Nvidia just to see the performance and how good is the streaming on those devices, I got the 4k Max and regular 4K stick, the cube blows those away, but I keep the 4K to take it ou to friends houses and enjoy some 3 party apps and watch movies. Controversial. A 1080p Blu-ray will have 2x+ the bitrate on average but it is also using an older an less efficient codec, it being H. From here, it was split ROUGHLY down the middle with half of folks telling me the 1080p Remux copies were the best while the other half said the 1080p bluray rips were better. The Express 4K+ has a Realtek 1315 processor and 4GB channel storage. 90:1 for about 85 min. How much better is the perceived quality difference between the RD+ Torrentio files (usually float in the 4-7gb range) and the full Remux files? Or is the main difference in audio? Any insight would be great as I'm debating on getting a shield to do Remux files but only if What I've started doing is having the remux until I watch the movie for the first time then deciding if I want to downgrade for archiving. Otherwise, 4K web-dl and 1080 remux can be very similar and you can’t really go wrong with either. My question was more for the shows/ movies that don’t have that. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. There is absolutely no difference between proper size encodes. The other series was Attack on Titan although in still images you could tell some difference nothing major what push people towards remux video (again without knowing which is which) was during the action scenes in the show. Internet An actual 4k remux — not a transcode, but a remux — will look completely identical provided everything in the chain properly supports the format. No difference. Every movie is going to be different. Which one would yall recommend for the best quality? I've been lurking in r/plex, r/hometheater, and r/homelab for a while, and I am looking for advice and resource recommendations on building a Plex setup that will give me 4k, HDR, super-saiyan, lossless or near-loss quality streams, possibly with the option to transcode down for remote users. 2020 is HDR. those guys take forever and pay attention to the easy stuff like banding and artifacts looking for "transparent" encodes. If you need Atmos then you need to know that although Atmos is marketed on the ATV, It's only available to streaming apps (Netflix I can't even see the difference from 4K remux and 1080p remux on a 65 inch sitting from my couch. So I own the 4K Blu-ray and a very casual LCD-4K-TV. Gaming. 39 GB, while the same movie in 2160p. Audio and video are two different animals, but I generally look for the video that has the highest bitrate. Quality wise there is no much difference to notice between remux and a Blu-ray. 4K vs 1080p is a factor only you can decide. The biggest difference would be seen between webdl and the remux as the webdl almost certainly doesn't have enough bitrate. I don't regret spending the premium on the 4K copy, because these are some of the greatest films ever made, so I don't mind owning them in the highest quality, even if the difference is literally maybe 5% at best. What’s better?? I'm getting a new 4k tv + sound system and I wanted to rewatch some of my old favourites in the higher quality. Mostly Kodi and I'm playing it via my 3rd gen fire cube. But the Shield has become far more consistent of late. it is as good of quality as the source contained. As alternative, I can download the Web-DL with DD+ Atmos. As others have said, HDR is probably the biggest benefit, so it depends mostly on if it’s a film that has a good HDR grade and/or a film that will benefit a lot from HDR. Hopefully The Boy and the Heron will get a 4K release too. Just wanted to get people's views on 4K vs 1080p on weather its worth it downloading/ripping 4K media based on the fact there double the size and the majority of releases are not True 4K, It's the only reason I have my cutoffs at 4k HDR rather than a 1080 remux 1080p is the resolution. While both could probably play the 4K remux equally well, the Shield is just so much easier to use and also super versatile in what you could use it for. I did comparing tests with Remux, HDB internals, scene encodes and 5,6,7 GB 1080p HEVC encodes and all looks the same regarding to video quallity. I would like to build a server with ~50 TB of RAID storage to handle this with whatever I don't really see a difference ce between the built in app vs the one on the shield. Q&A. These movies are typically around 40-60gb, or even larger huge discussion here on it - most agree the UHD is the best its ever looked. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog r/Piracy • by Jakjak81. My entire library is 4k UHD and 1080p BR rips. I used to reencode my blue rays now I leave them as remux and my 4k I always try to keep remux I thought pretty good deal. I was thinking of purchasing the Series S instead of the Nvidia Shield. Switching between the two, I could tell the streaming version was inferior amd was most likely a 4K upscale with possible AI added HDR metadata. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The hybrid then refers to different media sources (web vs bd) rather than different editions of the same type of media source (e. WEB. If you have a Roku TV and your streaming from a Plex app don't bother with 4K remux Dithered down web rips = cheap TV, sound bar setup Common setup but not meant for 4k viewing 4K remux = quality TV, hardwired network Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Xbox Series S 4k Remux vs Shield . Many 4K WEB-DL's are bit-starved fake upscales with awful HDR grading so the Blu-ray version will be superior. I just went from a 1080 priojector to a sony 4k 65 inch tv. No. Thanks for your assistance. I keep everything in 4K that comes in 4K. 265 by modern streaming services so not an apples to apple comparison. The remux has finer detail, smoother and more uniform. Just not *re-*encoded by a third party. If storage space is a concern then you should probably skip remuxes and grab encodes. 4 Atmos system, I started buying 4K UHD discs just in the last month. WG47 • You have a laptop with a 4k screen, but it can't hardware decode h265? Roku Ultra vs 4K Stick (2021) The (un)official home of #teampixel and the #madebygoogle lineup on Reddit. I would love Spirited Away or Princess Mononoke on 4K and those would be instant buys. In future you movie probably have no seeder to download if you delete the 4k hdr remux from your storage. The comparison between 1080p Blu-ray and 4K/HDR streaming gets even murkier thanks to Disney+ with their low effort HDR conversions of older movies. Right now, I use torrent to download 4k content (movies/tv), and generally the REMUX version is the best. 4K Remux vs Blu Ray Disk . It heavily depends on the movie/show. Good encodes crop the video to remove the black bars which means they can properly be viewed using plex, etc. A full disk rip is everything, essentially like having an original disk For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit 4K remux is 80 gig. Don't do 4K yet. Reply reply More replies. The only difference would be if author left out audio tracks and subtitles from the remux. If you inspect the armor of the guy in the back. A remux is a remux. So yes. Come and join us today! When you say pixels I'm assuming you mean compression artifacts or banding? A blu-ray remux will always be higher quality than anything re-encoded. That saidsome studios (like disney) make fake hdr which is just taking the 1080p bluray and adding a lut and metadata to trigger hdr which actually makes it look worse. Yeah it's great, download a remux and a high quality encode and compare for yourself. Universal kept those for themselves. Compared to the Blu-ray, there was almost no film grain and the people looked really smooth and waxy. The smaller Bluray rips use the remux files which are then re-encoded to a smaller size. I have an LG CX 65. Which would still amount to ~550GB of space Web-DL has - Worse image quality than 4k Remux The biggest area I see quality problems is movies with lots of dark scenes as you really see the artifacts even with fairly good quality files. Shout doesn't have 4K rights. The remux in MKV format, is just the video/audio/subtitles ripped from the disc and then put into an mkv container. Example I can't play 4k on one of my televisions but if I uninstalled all Plex updates and go back to the default that was installed on the shield 4K playback works just fine. Aspect Ratio is something to look out for. I see no artifacts or anything that would tip me off that I wasn't watching a remux. I’ve not seen it in 4k. But it's still worth downloading the 4k version for the HDR. Scene encodes tend to be fairly small compared to the complete BD, at the cost of some quality loss. I certainly can tell the difference between an HDR vs. Best 4k encodes vs remux for my setup Hey guys, so I'm setting up my plex server and I've been looking at torrents for 4k movies and I'm wondering what would be best, I dont have tons of storage and I'm seeing remuxes that are a lot of GB obviously then I'm seeing some encodes that are in the 20gb range but I've heard about 'tigole' being great which is quite low GB also. Having said that, if you're watching on the 1080p computer there's no reason to go for the 4k version. Using FEN and Mad Titan Sports on a firestick 4K Max vs a Gen 2 Cube is night and day. BTW, Avatar 2 due out end of this year is all 1. That being said, these REMUX Rips on Plex are right there. Reply reply The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. But i think the people who complain about the DNR on the 4k are right in some scenes, like where they lost the tip of the wizards staff. The best IMO are VII, IX and RO with Ep III coming in 4th (overall score for PQ/HDR/Audio). The dynamic range will make a much bigger difference in picture appreciation for me than pure image. It can work as a Media server with Plex, can be used for Games and of course for other Movie and Entertainment apps. I know that downloading a 4k uhd disc or remux is the best quality. Reddit’s little corner for iPhone lovers (and some people who just mildly enjoy it) Members Online. That's 1 frame still. They look pretty much the same. Remux is always best. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. So for example chapter for me plex streaming for 4K remuxes is so inconsistent even on direct play. Valheim; Genshin Impact; is there different in quality watching 4k between 4k remux and 4k Disc Player in 4k tv any worth different in quality to buy the player and the discs like OPPO players I know generally the answer is obvious on which one is better, but there have been some bad 4K releases. 6 Mb/s Comparison of Tenet 4K vs Blu Ray The question of if rips can be truly lossless and translate to the typical television set in the same way as a 4K disc in a Blu-ray player plugged into a 4K TV is something that continues to be unanswered I think. The whole movie in motion, there will be more artifacts. I personally would always prefer a 1080p blu-ray remux over a 4k Rip. There's no such thing as what you see in movies that "enhance" pictures or movies that were already blurry. How much "better" is the quality of Disney 4k remux with DV HDR vs the pirated complete 4kUHD (no DV) Are there any side-by-side comparisons? I understand there are also a few factors at play here (like the type of tv you have As I've read that remux is like the best you can get as its directly from the likes of a bluray without any alterations just being put into a . HDR. Indeed, on my current 55" 4k Samsung TV, I can't see a difference at ~7ft, so I just go for the encodes. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been Has anyone noticed the difference in quality when say watching a 4K Rip direct through tv’s USB or through client with Kodi/Plex, as opposed to a 4K UHD disc through a high BluRay is simply the media source. upscaled. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. I’m looking forward to some optimizations for AV1 as Plex can deliver 4K Blu-ray Rips that are near native Blu-ray quality. Bottom line Fire TV Stick Max is on Fire OS 7 (Android 9), have a little more RAM and CPU, supports WiFi 6 and AV1 video codec, if you are on budget I think Stick 4K (2018) is your best option, but if you can afford a better device then get the Fire TV Cube (2nd Gen) and forget Overall system memory usage was at 14% while transcoding a 4K remux to /tmp. One is the full disc, usually in the format . There are limitations with Dolby Vision around the audio tracks and being multiple layers that make it difficult to consume unless you have specific players like an new lg tv. For me I ended up using a combo of kodi and or jellyfin. It will have slightly more detail at times compared to a Blu-ray. At least with my video setup. they're just upscaled (you can go on blu-ray . The problem is that 4k takes way longer to download sometimes than 1080, and the GB size can be way bigger. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is lossless. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). . So that video file, while 4k in resolution, can be tiny. r/Roku A chip A close Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I’ve considered saving space and sanity and just going for 4K x265 encodes and using the roku again, but can’t find much information on bitrate size vs the remux 4K. Nothing in between! Seriously though, ~8GB 1080p movies are the sweet spot for me. It's the little things like scratches on an outfit, coloring, lighting even hair texture looks a bit different. And yes, BT. There are two types of remux. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app What I'm wondering is is there enough of a quality difference between a 4K ultra HD Blu-ray with Dolby vision versus purchasing a Pacific Rim, Dark Knight, etc, I For future better keep the 4k hdr remux. I’m finding more and more shows stream in 4k but are only released physically as a 1080p blu rays. 4K remux mkv vs 4K bluray Question Hello, Has anyone compared playing a 4K remux mkv file ( 60-80 gb ) played We're now read-only indefinitely due to Reddit Incorporated's poor management and decisions related to third party platforms and content management. e. I've learned that I don't have to have a remux only mentality. I personally think the 1080p remuxes look/sound better then a 4k non remux It means they’ve taken the video and audio from a 4K Bluray disc and converted it to mkv format without any re-encoding. For example I watched thor ragnarok from a lossless remux vs his encode (just testing) on a 55 4k tv and honestly at where i was setting i couldn't notice a difference. Watching tv from 2-2,5 m distance in my room. I have a 43in 4K TV that costs about $500 and S9 ultra that costed $1700, and I watched 15 minutes of Interstellar on both with 2 files, 1 is Remux that was about 70GB and then your average 20-25GB Blu-ray rip, so the total 60 minutes I spent helped me establish that I see or hear absolutely zero difference for "my" setup. You just have to check the file size. Maybe all these companies use special software to make the file size smaller without losing quality. I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux compared to something like a decent 20-30gb encoded bluray rip? Is it really worth the extra space these files take up when viewed on a nice big screen, or is there a point of diminishing returns if the encode is good enough? also forgive me if this question has been asked a lot, I'm just interested in I just hope they get streaming up to snuff, if there's absolutely no difference between streaming and 4k blue ray and there's good streaming options I'm all for it, less storage easier to go about, like a paid plex server or something, but as of now I'm gonna keep going for 4k blu rays as well, I mean even normal blu rays + upscaling between the tv and blue ray player is leagues ahead of Plex can play 4K remixes no problem but they really screwed something up with the latest updates. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a 4k remux vs. this is just my personal opinions. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS 1080p Remux vs 2160p Web Download . My own video camera is a 4k and is 1gb per minute recording. There's also a lot of P2P groups that aim for transparency, i. The 1080p version is de-noised to high hell to look like Futurama or Family Guy that's done on a computer and not hand drawn on paper like that cartoon has been. Roku Streaming Stick 4K—what’s the difference? The difference between the two players is that Roku Streaming Stick 4K has a voice remote with TV controls, while Roku Streaming Stick 4K+ has our best remote, featuring a lost remote finder, rechargeable battery, and hands-free voice controls. Am I better watching a 4K remux that has standard HDR, Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 480p>720p>1080p>2160p(4k) Remux is an untouched BluRay. Use software to convert the 4k hdr remux to 4k sdr or 1080p. g. com to check. I have a 4TB hard drive that I just filled up with a bunch of Tigole's 4k HDR HEVC files since all his bluray rips were so good (and those included commentaries and extras). It's based on screen size, distance sitting, and your eyesight. On the go There is no difference. The menus in Fen load twice as quick, and the widgets load 10x quicker if your using a skin. My goal is to buy a NAS and to do my own library on it. there's very little difference between the encodes and the source it was made from, though that is something that requires a bit more bitrate, so their encodes end up larger. If you’re using a remux, both 1080p and 4K will be FAR better than what Netflix can deliver. Remux is short for Remultiplex. FraMeSToR? Question Best. When you remux something you take the original files or streams contained within the original multiplex and reorganise them into another multiplex without altering the original files in any way. Any time you re-encode a blu-ray, (which is what a Rip is) you will get some amount of compression artifacts and light banding. When I started collecting 4K releases, I went down the path of finding which ones are true 4K vs. 1080p remux is 30 gig. There is no correct answer. I have a 4K HDR tv. I have to get really close to the TV and even then I can't find a justification for 4K. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. Checking dark frames, and motion frames too and don't see a difference in detail. I dint mention it to them I also hid which of the files was the remux vs the encode. I didn't say that that, either. Both are 4k, both are the same duration. Because of the higher bit rate with the 4k blu-ray you do notice a difference. I have a copy of Dune which is a remux and supports DV. 1080p can be upscaled to 4K by turning each 1x1 pixel into 2x2 pixels because 1080p is exactly 1/4th the size and proportions of 4K. However, the reason I am asking this question again on this sub, is because I am specifically interested in whether the difference would be Generally, using a GPU to handle conversions of permanent files is frowned upon. But in 4K TVs with atleast 50" screen size is QXR the better choice or the difference wouldn't be that big? (Let's say Maybe I’m wrong. I think most would If it's 4k, MA / amazon VOD then 4k framestor / wildcat remux, no 4k encodes for me. My older Streaming Sticks, 3600 and 3800, both with 256MB of channel storage, need to reload channels far too often. Or check it out in the app stores Best 4K REMUX Release Groups? See the recent Love Actually 2160p REMUX release from FraMeSToR vs CiNEPHiLES as an example. Or 1080p remux vs 2160p blu ray . I have a 4K TV. Right. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been REMUX strips a lot of extra data and repacks it to save space, the core movie and audio tracks are intact, but that's about it. OLEDs can't produce a picture as bright as, say, a QLED. Plus, I wouldn't want a 4K Blu-ray based on their Blu-ray release with their revisionist color scheme. i could be wrong , what is your thought ? The 2nd one is in hdr but is 50GB while the 1st one is REMUX and 100GB. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a remux vs. I didn't want a fragmented library in terms of resolution, so I tested, asked the industry experts, and settled on 2560. Then you can decide if you want the lossless audio tracks a TrueHD & DTS-X tracks can be 4Mbps or more by themselves. Also not all 4k/2k is superior to 1080p if mastered or encoded poorly. The biggest difference between the discs and Disney+ will be bitrate and lossless audio. This goes for 4K or 1080. Another big thing I've noticed for encode vs remux is aspect ratios. Get support, learn new information, and hang out in the subreddit dedicated to Pixel, Nest, Chromecast, the Assistant, and a few more things from Google. (also, in that case the audio track seems to be exactly the same) noob question, is there any difference in watching a downloaded 4k remux or a $300-400 uhd player with a $30 physical 4k bluray? Archived post. I want to know if the difference between a remux file and a rip is Shop Collectible Avatars; Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. they could even be described as just “ok”. It plays back around a 130mbps which is pretty much the same way it’d play on the actual disc itself. Or check it out in the app stores BluRay 2160p REMUX bit rate: 46. Your second example with the low bitrate is also not a remux. Remux is just like shedded version on Blu-ray,scraping extras and audios nothiing different If you’re getting your movies from other sources, make sure you’re getting remux content. The one issue I had woth DV on the TV app using plex, is that th TV NIC interface is limited to 100mbps, which many streams from plex (rips or downloaded content) at 4k woth DV and Atmos can blow past that number in bits per second. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, lowering the quality, in Most 4K is upscaled (especially when cgi heavy) from the source anyway so its really the hdr that adds the deep color and contrast to make the pq look far superior to the sdr when done right. Just what those terms loosely mean. The standard scenes aren’t much of an upgrade. and 1. I believe they went all out on bonus features back when they did the Ultimate Editions, and the same bonus disc from those is in the current 2-Disc Special Edition Blu-Rays, so if you want the most behind the scenes stuff then definitely grab those Blu-Ray editions. The Stick gains Dolby Vision support, MIMO Wi-Fi (it supports multiple network streams from the router which could theoretically improve speeds, and also the Wi-Fi antenna is part of the USB cable which should improve signal strength), and comes with the voice remote by default whereas the Express only comes with the IR remote. Same with 4K REMUX and compressed versions. 4k. Skip to main content. GPU's have encoders that are designed specifically to do decoding and encoding fast at the expense of quality and compression efficiency. You’re Probabaly transcoding the video. mkv. This is 7GB/Ep. Remux = Remux. All I can say is, the 1080p Remux is guaranteed to look good while the 4K WEB-DL will be a hit or miss. 78:1 (16:9) in IMAX. New. "Dune" is 1. Non remuxes of both are between 3-15 gigs . If you are more of extras loving guy like deleted scenes or making of movie or any edited scenes etc then go for full Bluray. 265 encodings. Maybe if I did stills but who knows. 3 Mb/s IMAX 2160p WEB-DL bit rate: 16. Do it with a proper 4K TV. Nearly everyone agreed that the 4K remux and 1080p remux versions looked identical. All are upgrades PQ and some in audio (ATMOS). WEB-DL vs Bluray for 4k HDR content . Old. Not many IMAX theaters can show 1. I always use strict with a 0 Crop now (if I encode anything) Compare Image quality with Screenshots directly. The same goes for audio, with Blu-rays offering near-lossless audio quality and a far wider dynamic range The 4k REMUX is better, you can see the grain of the paper they drew the cartoon on!!! Look at the curtain and the insane amounts of detail in the colour gradient. A 4K file at low quality will have less information than the 1080p copy. Now if I update Plex again it goes back to the buffering issues. From what I understand though, Loki was filmed for 4K, so the physical release should be better than the Blu-Ray, right? none of the 2160p HDR flicks are Remux much smaller file sizes compared to Remux most releases are WEB H265 For example, a 2160p. 43:1 (either 70mm film or 4K IMAX with Laser). ailee43 This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Only difference should be the amount of audio and subtitle tracks. My tv supports 4k HDR I have already started downloading the REMUX one but I dont see the HDR tag in the title while the other one does have HDR in the title but no REMUX. It's a 1:1 copy of the original video file. If I direct connect an external hard drive with 4k remux file, can the Series View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. At this point, it looked like the real race was between 1080p remux and 1080p bluray rips. That's not a remux, but is an encode. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. A remux is a direct extract from the source. I do not know if this is right, but just wanted to know you guys's input on x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. Makes me You do notice a difference. Why are the HDR movies much smaller than Remux? Is there a loss of A/V quality? The 4K sets are basically nothing but the 4K movie and Blu-Ray movie with little extra. I have a 65 inch 1080p screen, whats better for me 1080p remux or 2160p blu ray? As for quality, I doubt you will see a difference even on a 4K screen. This post 4K HDR Movies: A Pirates Guide : Piracy (reddit. Roku Streaming Stick 4K+ vs. As for which is better a smaller 4K versus a larger 1080p, that would depend entirely on you having a 1080p TV/monitor vs 4K TV/monitor. Choose a movie which is native 4k. VLC has always been known to have hdr issues, which might be your problem, provided once again we’re talking about an actual remux. Honestly, I can tell absolutely no difference between my 4K copy and the 1080p version. Try to find the difference and see if that is worth it. Would the quality of a 4K Blu ray played through a Blu Ray Player connected to a Receiver be better than a 4k Remux file played on an Nvidia Shield View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Shouldn't matter. There are quite a few apps out there to play remux files. 99% of the 4K hdr remux copies are hdr10. All the same shade. Hybrid would solve this issue but until I find that what’s my best option? Archived post. Depends on the film. :D remux has the highest Unfortunately I’ve had issues with the pro and miss the roku. you're asking what the difference between euros and eggs is. Can people really tell the difference between a 25 gb digital movie and the same film remux at 50gb+? While I also prefer high bitrate bluray remux, I'll always prefer a hdr 4k to a sdr bluray when available. An example I saw today was Handmaid’s Tale, all 3 seasons are on blu rays but also available as a 4k webrip. I am trying to decide if I should buy the 4K HDR version of predator or the blu Ray remastered version. 1080p vs 4k playback on iPhone DLSS ultra perf 4K vs performance 1440p on 4K screen upvotes For me its because of his encode quality vs the size. It is not encoded A remux is definitely encoded. Proper Encode = ~450MB If you need to save some space you should encode. I generally want my TV shows and movies to be around 8 mbps or so. I’d expect 4k remastered movies with cinema filters being added post production to be way bigger in file size. And if you are going to inspect it, please don't do it on an Iphone or Laptop or Computer monitor and say there is no difference. After reading reviews I decided on balance it wouldn’t look significantly different to be worth spending £45. In movies, PSA 1080p is around 2-4GB while QXR Tigole 1080p is around 4-9GB, In 1080p display, you can't see the difference. in IMAX. With the roku only having a 10/100 port, i know the remux bitrate can sometimes go over 100mb and cause issues. Reply reply I have "40 LED Full HD tv. I’d advise getting the remux, but if you’re looking for the absolute highest quality version of Apocalypse Now you might have better luck looking for the 200gb dcp remux or 1 tb 4k prores Since I have a 83” A90J OLED and a 7. But what should I be looking for if I'm looking for compressed versus not compressed video files? Edit: I know nothing about file compression. I can tell the difference depending on where I'm sitting from a 4k vs 1080p. Disk space is cheap compared to the CPU to transcode it offline. Or check it out in the app stores Remux vs encoded 4k movies? Which one is better for performance ? Question Open comment sort options. There are more variables than that, such as encoding settings. The Blu-ray itself is already (almost always) a loss of quality from the original source recording, so I don't see the point in storing a 20 - 50 GB file when an 8 - 15 GB file will rival the quality at A true remux is a rip of a Blu-ray formatted in a way digital players can handle. Best. My hope is that with DBS Super Hero being fairly recent that more releases could be coming. Get the Reddit app Scan this 4K Remux - EPSiLON vs. There’s a sale on Roku right now and I’m wondering if the ultra is worth buying over the 4K stick. Ideally i would want the 4k versions but how much of a difference is the blu ray vs the 4k for those that have watched both? If i can find a good deal on 4k ill for sure pick them up but for the price i felt like i couldn't pass them up. I can download GoT as 4K Blu Ray Remux (with lossless Atmos, which I really appreciate) with 25 GB/Ep on UHD movies. Those sources would be called remuxs and they are 45-80gb for a 4K remux. Remux movie is 49. 43:1 for about 70 min. I don't know what the difference is between the two processors, but the Express 4K+ 4GB channel storage seems very desirable. Sure, the Shout special features aren't on the 4K release but you can make your own package by combining discs. Whereas, encodes have minimal buffering. A remux will be the highest quality possible, and as you guessed, won't saturate a gigabit line (most 4K remuxes average between 50 and 70Mbps, with peaks that might get into the 200s for very short amounts of time). m2ts, which includes extras and disc navigation. I can hear the difference betwen FLAC and 320 Kbps lossy!" Uh huh. High bitrate 1080p will be better than meh bitrate 4k even at h. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. Either 4K remux rips, or terrible VHS rips from 30 years ago. If you have 4K, use it. For 4K you’re better off having your server hardwired to the router, or having your 4K content on a HDD if you’re using a Shield. I have a bunch of 25-50GB 4K movies, but only selected ones I want it great quality. If you have the storage space, sure, keep the 4K REMUX files and play them, blissfully unaware that you can, in fact, compress them down for more efficient storage and transfer and do so while being perceptually identical. A multiplex is a stream or file that has multiple other files or streams contained within it. 01000110010110012 • • Edited . Its compressed you still get 4K definition and high-quality audio—you do lose some detail compared to a 4K Blu-ray. 03 GB. 2. Film grain vs digital smooth. Now, imagine that we just have a plain blue frame. It became a game of too much work and not enough information. 4K Blu-rays also benefit from greater color resolution which would be more obvious with the linework and sharp color edges of some animation, so that might be worth upgrading for as well, and . However if you’ve watched a lot of true 4K on a Filesize doesn't always equate to a better quality, it's a good thing to start looking at, but not the end all be all. My majority of films are 4K REMUX so as much data as a 4K UHD disc. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. I only have watched the show on HBO Max never in physical form. 43:1 digital 4K IMAX movies. Good encodes (DON, SbR, etc) you will not notice the difference between the remux and the encode. This is WAYYY too big for my little server (2-4TB right now). 1080 is typically easy to stream over Wi-Fi, but you may have issues with 4K. I did have to go hardwire vs wifi because my wifi is not stable enough to play 100gb remux files. The IMAX scenes all look amazing on 4k so that’s the biggest reason to upgrade. For some reason when i watch 4K HDR Movies (Remux Movies with hardrive connected to Nvidia Shield) with Nvidia shield compare to connecting my Hardrive directly to my TV, the Nvidia Shield has a bit kind of downgrade in the picture quality, the Picture look a bit more blurier and the colours looks less pop out and less alive, did anyone tried to compare and got the same If you had asked me a few months ago I would have said the Shield is over hyped and HDR looked shocking compared to the ATV 4K or indeed a half decent HTPC. Hoarder-Setups This comes up a lot for tv shows, Reminder for everyone to buy a 4k blu ray player! You mean Fire TV Stick 4K (2018)? well you can see all the differences between them here. And I cannot detect a difference either on my LG 77" CX OLED or 140" JVC 4K projector (or my 4K computer display for that matter) even when standing up close to the screen swapping back and forth really quick between the Remux and encode and pixel peeping. Will the quality look exactly the same compared to a 4k disc being played on a high-end 4k player on an LG oled tv? Hi I currently have a server with around 20TB storage and want to upgrade some of my movies to 4K but want the quality to be great, I have a 55 inch 4K samsung tv and usually sit about 5-7 feet away from it. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. The difference between that and Netflix streaming or even ITunes digital movies, was considerable to me. The difference will vary between the movies (as expected). Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. But I still see a significant difference between the UHD-BD and the regular BD. The only time I'm getting 4K is if a movie I like has been remastered in 4K and haven't got a 1080p blu-ray release, which is rare. The "true" original IMAX format is 1. I always thought encodes are compressed versions of the remux, but I have been reading that 4K encodes are not noticeable from 4K remuxes. etc etc. How many bytes should that take up? Video has a "code" to say "all these pixels are the same damned color", at least figuratively speaking. We’re talking 4k quality though, so I’m a skeptic. H. But would it make more sense to grab the Web-DL of movies like this and remux with the better TrueHD 7. However, I was wondering if there is a noticeable difference between a Bluray I tried a Remux of The Last of Us vs an encode I did myself on AV1, then another I downloaded on H265. I think the shadows might be a bit sharper but that's about it. Come and join us today! Filesize: Remux = 1GB vs. Hybrids are the best, but that’s because they are multisourced. You want to use CPU for the best results. If I paused it on my 70” TV, and inspected a specific scene with all 3 Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. 1 Atmos track, or just get the Blu-ray release? And let's just assume that ripping the Blu-ray results in the same general bitrate for comparison purposes. A lot of movies aren't real 4k. What makes one remux possibly better is source material for video, audio, or a combination thereof. But when it comes to 4K, things (mainly storage) start to change your perspective. So you keep all the original information. But apples to apples, it would then depend on how you watch the content. Who know you probably getting a hdr hardware in the future and dont have to redownlod the 4k hdr remux again. com has reviews up for 1-5 and RO. 4K WEB-DL vs 4K Remux Discussion I want to download DUNE 2 in 4K I found these two versions one is 25 MB/s overall bitrate about 29 GB and the remux is 53 MB/s about 59 GB both are HDR/DV, My TV is Samsung 4k with HDR but not oled Let’s say I have a 2tb hard drive with a 4k remux movie file. After digging into this subreddit a little though, it seems people are highly against watching such Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. This allows me to play DV and Atmos (lossless). It's not to say that the 4k stream doesn't look good compared to the regular Blu ray but the stream has nothing on the 4k blu-ray. Step 1 is to not download the 4k light junk in your first example. Honestly, I can hardly tell a difference between 1080 and 4k. I'm weighing up whether to buy it digitally or get the 4K bluray, which I'd play in my Series X (not the most advanced 4K player, I know, but it's all I've got for now). Or check it out in the app stores Web-DL 30GB vs Remux HDR 69GB. Obviously you can rip it in much higher bitrates or just remux. Correct. I have been taking 4k remux, 4k encodes, 1080 remux and 1080 encodes and comparing quality by pixel peeping and watching and comparing while 6 feet away from the tv. I have decided that the quality difference is not worth the increase in space. us bd video, eu bd audio). This is most obvious in darker images and color gradients, where compression results in flat textures or banding. This also gets files much easier to play over wifi networks. lwbc paa cffeey ehhh cpgdqs qocg whs ktda bbguoe knsla