Major revision in research very often you need at least one revision, mostly two or even three revisions are required. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. This complex act of scientific communication involves balancing diplomacy with integrity, creativity and systematicity. Indeed, the author of an Feb 28, 2019 · A research team of one of our editors has a paper working its way through the submission system with a major biology journal; the editor helped to write the paper alongside a PhD student who works with the group. I was thinking today about decisions of "major revisions" from submitted papers. , technicians, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows). I'd say maybe 40 were "minor revision. Revising might be necessary at the document level, the chapter level, the paragraph level, or the sentence level. Two were happy with my first round of revision; the third reviewer is the one who asked me to undertake another round of (major) revision. Now, again it Your revision, therefore, should invite readers more fully into your research process. This can include conducting new data analysis or experiments, overhauling or substantially reframing the literature review or discussion section, or integrating a substantial amount of new background research. I submitted a manuscript as a Research Paper last May 12 to Journal A. At others, the difference is less clear-cut and may simply reflect the editor's feeling of how many additional rounds of review may be necessary. This should be a minor revision. " The remaining 40 fell into the "revise and resubmit" or "major revision" or some similar Major revision: The manuscript might be published after major revision, Original research manuscripts may be submitted to APL Photonics in Article or Letter Feb 22, 2021 · There's another function of the "major"/"minor" distinction which is external: a minor revision sends the signal that the paper is very likely to be accepted if all comments are addressed. 3 One approach suggested for digesting the reviewers’ comments involves reading the reviews once, putting it aside for a couple of days A community for sharing and discussing UX research. Open to both academic and applied research. Such revisions necessitate conceptual reorganization, proper judgment, and the investment of considerable time and serious effort by the author. He/She wanted to provide more details in some parts of my manuscript. In my experience, when a major revision is requested, it means that the Editor thinks that the paper is interesting and can be rendered publishable; otherwise it would have been directly rejected Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have been addressed. I sent the revised version, and the editor said he would let us know the decision after referee's recommendation. ' Learn what these editorial decisions precisely mean, and how to react. Where a revised manuscript has been considered by reviewers for a second time and the manuscript is found to require major revision, the manuscript may be rejected and the authors encouraged to submit a new manuscript. The Editor(s)-in-Chief makes a decision on the manuscript, for which there are four options: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. . 0 of the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines 2023 | Background The European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines were revised in 2023 for the Jul 24, 2024 · Major revisions are those that require substantial changes to your methods, results, or interpretation, while minor revisions are those that involve editing, formatting, or clarifying some points. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. and ask to submit revised version in about 14 days. Roughly five were accept without revision. ) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. new Version(major, minor, build, majorRevision | (minorRevision << 16) This results in 1. Now, again it Minor Revision The manuscript is viewed as having a high potential for publication in CTRJ. However, I have now made major revisions (almost half of the entire article) as per the editor’s request. Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if so, please provide sufficient explanation as to why you believe this to be the The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. I think of a major revision as one that involves substantial changes to the manuscript. If it is taking long process of review time (more than 3 weeks) after minor revision then any revised decisions can be For a review journal like The Lancet Neurology, it is rather worrying that the results of a cohort analysis published recently in the BMJ suggest that review articles are not as accurate and reliable as most clinicians think (BMJ 2003; 327: 266). First, I look at the decision. 1. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. The status stayed "with the editor" for around 4 months and suddenly, I get a rejection for my Dec 8, 2019 · I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. The other asked to correct the number of a certain section. There are several Major revision on research because of our leader Discussion We just finished our colloquium, we had a problem on our SOP, we we're adviced that either we change that one question and proceeded to just change the ST or keep the question and revised everything from RRL, RI, ST etc. Jun 6, 2021 · Why is it important to distinguish between minor and major revisions? Question 3. 3 Astrophysics Research and Analysis (APRA) solicits basic research proposals for investigations that are relevant to NASA’s programs in astronomy and astrophysics and includes research over the entire range of photons, gravitational waves, and particle astrophysics. Many students skip the revision process, mistaking editing for revision. ROSES-2022 Amendment 45 announces a major revision to the sections of D. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the Jun 1, 2011 · Although not absolutely mandatory, it is a fact that nearly all manuscripts undergo revision in the process of peer review. I start my revision process with three initial steps. See full list on master-academia. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. If authors are unable to satisfactorily address the comments, further revisions may be required or the paper may be rejected. 'Minor revisions’ means that a manuscript only has to undergo small changes and improvements before it can be published in an academic journal. Page charges and publication costs for research publications in legitimate research Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Now, again it It is likely possible when paper sent new reviewer than earlier reviewers. Now, 6 months later, I have received a decision letter recommending " undertake a major revision, and re-submit a revised version of your paper as a Technical Note". It’s just like in a hospital: if you get hit by a bus, you are taken to the emergency room and a Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Jan 30, 2015 · Request PDF | A Major Revision | This chapter focuses on the aims, theory, and steps involved in revising the Relationship Inventory (RI) to produce the basic 64-item forms. How long does it take to give a decision after revision? ROSES program element D. In fact, of the nearly 40,000 manuscripts that we have reviewed, I cannot recall a single one that was accepted without at least some revision, and I can count on my fingers the number that have been recommended by even one reviewer for unrevised acceptance. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. There is still no guarantee of acceptance at this stage but the chances are certainly higher than at initial submission. In this situation, if all requested changes are made, a minor Major Revision: This typically implies that the manuscript requires significant changes before it can be considered for publication. I view a major revision as an ‘accept after lots of work’. Sep 10, 2020 · I submitted to a journal, in which I got a minor revision. Just because you get that kind of feedback doesn't mean that your work is bad, it just means something more which is "major" (but hopefully minor relative to the scope of the work done up to that point), remains. In a paper exploring coaching within and outside of medical education, my co-author and I received requests from two reviewers for additional insights into how we enacted reflexivity. We have submitted a major revision with positive comments from both reviewers and after one and half month it is still with editor. **New to research? What exactly does major revision mean? This means the manuscript needs to be substantially improved before it can be accepted. Cite. We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. Writing a response letter for the editor and reviewers is always a challenging process. This feedback leads to the next key step: revising your manuscript. If there was a change in the meaning of your results, be sure to edit the "frame" for your results (in the abstract, introduction, discussion, and/or conclusion, especially). The revised article will be sent back to the reviewers. Are the authors willing to conduct the necessary new experiments? Aug 19, 2020 · I am planning to submit my thesis next month. Jul 12, 2016 · I have a same problem with Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. I am kind of concerned about a rejection after 2 years of submission-revision process. However, small, but important, content changes are needed for clarification and to strengthen the manuscript. Dec 9, 2020 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. This change has occurred Jun 24, 2023 · In general, in the context of the process of publishing in scientific journals, the phrase “wait for the results of the review after review” refers to the period it takes for the research to Jan 8, 2024 · For USENIX Security, the acceptance rates of major revised manuscripts are very high: 85. We have emailed to EIC several times to request the status but no reply. Surprisingly, today I received a "Major Revision", which is quite unlikely. The reviewers' and editors' comments provide guideposts as to why a paper receives a “major” versus “minor” revision decision. The paper is on a path to publication, but there is a significant amount of work to be done. 9. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. I done the revisions and i submitted last week. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. A maximum of two rounds of major revision per manuscript are normally provided. HIV Med. The authors analysed reviews of treatment for type II diabetes and concluded that doctors who rely on reviews may be misled. There are many cases where the major revisions require a different review pool, where the reviewers specific that they wash their hands and wont re-review and or when the major revisions alter the interpretation and outcome in some way. The acceptance of the manuscript depends on the revisions made. I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. Sentences with unnecessary modifiers. Jul 1, 2018 · Eventually, the manuscript will be accepted or rejected. Feb 21, 2018 · these are the most important author should consider before/while submission, otherwise there is a fair possibility of receiving rejection, major revision, and minor revision comments from the I just sent back a review as Major Revision for a paper I really liked, but wasn't really done yet. In this post, I go over the concrete (and, sometimes, counter-intuitive) steps I Mar 30, 2022 · Hello everybody. You can and must do the revisions in order for your paper to be accepted. com Major revisions are almost always sent back to reviewers for a re-review to determine whether the comments have been addressed and no new comments are raised. Wordy: There are two major experiments that the Biology Department sponsors. I received a major revision of one of my articles. So you have to wait a long time. The key reason of rejection after revision is the major comments have not been adequately addressed. Outright acceptance of a journal paper is rare. Major revisions means - do not send this back to the journal unless it has been changed substantially to address the concerns I have raised - I think there is hope, but I have no patience for someone making minor changes. Oct 18, 2023 · Download Citation | Major revision version 12. I got my third major revision mail today. What is the correct formulae to combine the major and minor revisions? Thanks Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 7% in 2020 3 and 86% in 2021. The corrections were easy and I resubmitted the article. For some journals, including JGME, major versus minor is not determined by the number of comments, but by the journal's commitment to publish. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. If they give you major revision, you have to revise the paper thoroughly. Research Notes promote dialog among the information systems community by incrementally extending well-researched phenomena or providing methodological commentaries. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. Awards may be for up to four years’ duration (up to five years for suborbital investigations), […] Feb 27, 2020 · The manuscript had gone through a similarity check before submission. The mail reads as follows: Sep 29, 2014 · When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. , market research, medical anthropology, public health, design research). 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to HOW TO START ADDRESSING THE REVIEWERS–DIGEST THEIR COMMENTS. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. For example, if an Associate Editor in a journal submits their original research paper to their own journal for peer review, the manuscript may be assigned to another editor for the journal. I've published a fair number of research papers (~20) in my career (broadly speaking, in the life sciences), and I would say ~3/4 got an inital decision of "major revisions" or equivalent (ignoring of course rejections). 3364-81-04-02-08 Research Incentive Program, College of Medicine & Life Sciences 3 Support of personnel engaged in research activities (e. Apr 8, 2012 · What is a major revision? I often get reviews back that suggest “major revisions” in one or many of the following categories: More/different simulations; New simulations; Re-organization of content; Re-writing language; Asking for more references; Asking me to include a new method; Asking me to implement someone else’s method for comparison Jan 10, 2023 · When the authors receive a decision of major revision or minor revision, the authors are usually allowed to have 1 week to 3 months for the revision, which varies widely among journals. Since then it has been 2 months, but yet to receive the decision. Mar 12, 2014 · I just reviewed a paper as needing ‘major revisions’ where I thought a major set of experiments needed redoing whereas in the very same journal with the same editor (!!), my paper received accept with major revisions where the comments are minor editorial revisions of the manuscript (no major experimental flaws)! Major Revision Selecting “Major Revision” means that the topic is believed to be appropriate for CTRJ but there are major concerns with the manuscript that can be corrected to enable acceptance. Pay attention to all the reviewers comments and suggestions. Oct 12, 2021 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 1: tenofovir-based backbone plus an unboosted integrase Reject: The paper is not publishable as is and not likely to be publishable even with a revision. Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a 'minor revisions' verdict, look no further: get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! Contents When to decide Submitting a research paper to an academic journal is an important step for any researcher. 8. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. While they are in their rights to reject the revision, this is now somewhat unlikely, unless, of course, you do not do the work on the revision. If it is an ‘accept’, ‘minor revision’ or ‘major revision’, I celebrate. Sep 19, 2019 · Navigating peer review: How to respond to peer reviewer comments – Major revisions. 审稿决定“Major revision” 意味着你的论文有被接受的机会，但是审稿人要求做一些实质性的、重要的修改。 针对审稿人的审稿意见的修改预计肯定需要比“小修”和“大修”更长的时间，期刊编辑将允许提交修回论文更长的截止日期。 I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. One recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance. Now, again it To me, a minor revision would be suggestions for additional content (less of a "you're missing this" and more of "hey it'd be awesome if you could comment on this topic), or it'll be needed fixes to content that you got outright wrong, but which won't fundamentally affect the work and can typically just be fixed by omitting or mildly rephrasing Oct 18, 2023 · Background: The European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines were revised in 2023 for the 19th time, and all aspects of HIV care were updated. I agree, minor revisions are entirely writing errors, while major revisions requires data reinterpretation. Research Notes. Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. So, while you may feel beaten down by seven pages of comments from reviewers , know that a “major revisions” decision is a pathway towards improvement. Peer review for papers submitted by the journal’s editorial team member (Editor-in-Chief/Guest Editor/Editorial Board Member/ etc. 3 Hence digesting the reviewers’ comments, preferably over a few days would be helpful. This change has occurred Research Commentaries will be shorter in length (no more than 20 pages) than Research Articles with up to a maximum of 8 pages of figures and tables. Revised: The Biology Department sponsors two major experiments. Two reviewers accepted the manuscript and one asked for major revision I submitted a manuscript to a journal recently, and although their standard procedure involves two reviewers, I received Feb 17, 2022 · Getting a “major revisions” decision is quite common. Past Major-Revision-Cycle-2 submission deadline: Saturday Nov 30, 2024, 11:59 AM UTC Jun 30, 2023 · Major revision indicates that you still have quite some work to do in the methodology, findings, etc. Wordy: Two extremely famous and well-known consumer advocates spoke eloquently in favor of the proposed important legislation. My Mar 28, 2021 · Major revision. The Mary Baker Eddy Library’s collection includes letters and documents related to some of the statements made in that Journal article. 1111/hiv. The goal is to think about UX research broadly and consider studies from related/overlapping disciplines (e. I submitted with the minor revision two days ago and today, I got a mail saying that a major revision is suggested. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. Talking with co-authors we disagree and would like to submit the paper to a different journal (Journal B). 今天我们来一起看看按外审意见改后要怎么回复。 当你收到'Major Revision'的修改意见时，这意味着编辑和审稿人认为你的论文有潜力，但需要进行一些重要的修改和改进才能符合期刊的要求和标准（ 如果希望不大的话，压根就不会给你修改的机会 ）。 Mar 15, 2020 · Along with writing your first journal paper, doing a substantial revision to your manuscript upon receiving the reviewers’ comments is one often-cited painful moment of any doctoral process. However, changes should be Oct 25, 2023 · This recommendation should be supported by a reviewer report explicit in its rationale for why major revision is needed and how authors can revise the paper accordingly (Citation 14). Research articles submitted to journals are initially evaluated by an editor, or an editorial board member, in a process we call ‘editorial triage’. Oct 31, 2016 · I'm using the following code to combine the major and minor revisions. These revisions should not involve any major changes. This student is handling manuscript submission and thus all communications with the journal editorial office. Now, again it Mar 16, 2023 · ICSE 2025, Research Track. Awards may be for up to four years’ duration (up to five years for suborbital investigations), […] I have submitted my manuscript to the Hindawi journal five months ago. Just focus on what you think should be improved regarding research questions or objectives, theoretical background, improvement in the relevant studies of each Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. Feb 27, 2024 · I have refereed 200+ papers I will tell you what I think the difference is. Apr 25, 2017 · It is totally different from "accept with major revision" (which might be finally rejected if poorly revised), and "accept with minor revision". Minor Revision: The paper is mostly sound but will be sent back to the authors for minor corrections and clarifications such as the addition of minor citations or the tweaking of arguments. While editing is also very important, revision is an integral part of any good writing process. These changes are expected to take significantly longer and we will allow a longer deadline for you to submit. Thus, authors should proceed with an invitation for a minor revision with the same care as they approach an invitation for a major revision. THANKS!! Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Unlike editing, which tends to focus on final proofreading, revising often involves major changes to a document. Deadlines. After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. Despite this, the third revision indicated that all his/her concerns were "fully addressed" in the first round of revision. 0. 1 It was a lot of work, as usual. 65536 but the maximum value allowed for the Revision is 65535. Cite Animesh Talapatra Jan 5, 2021 · Now that the reviews have come, I see that the reviewers say that there is no novelty in the paper because a recent paper (published two months ago) has shown the exact same thing. 5 However, before handing out the precious major revision verdict, reviewers examine the rebuttal for indicators showing the team’s revision competency. Minor revision may undergo referee evaluation; however, in most cases, the editor accepts the paper without sending the revised manuscript to the reviewer. Apr 7, 2016 · The exact semantics of major or minor revisions will depend on the journal - at some journals, a minor revision will not be externally reviewed any more, while a major revision will. g. Knowing how to respond to both minor and major revisions can greatly affect your chances of getting published. Both of my reviewers were nice and gave good points to work on. After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', 'minor revisions', or 'paper accepted. It is rare The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). After submission, I received a request for major revisions, which has left me somewhat are some way from being worthy of further consideration even with a major revision; and (iii) poor presentation. – Sep 11, 2020 · ROSES program element D. If the manuscript requires major or minor revisions, the author should follow the journal’s guidelines for revision as noted in the author’s instructions. A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. is that minor or major revision? Question. 3 reviewers were involved. Major revisions may require simply moving parts of the text around, or they may require the authors to reanalyze the data and rewrite the whole manuscript. Perhaps this is the reason that so many new journals appear and Dec 28, 2024 · 如题，求问各位学友，我的一篇临床文章投了current eye research，现在给了2个月major revision。 一般多久修回比较合适呢？文章我已经改完了，但是太快了，编辑和审稿人会不会认为我没有认真对待呢？ Major revision version 11. Throughout the whole revision process, authors should bear in mind that even a minor revision does not guarantee acceptance after revision. 0 of the guidelines recommend the same six first-line treatment options for antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naïve adults as versions 11. Additionally, the Conflict of Interest section of the published manuscript, if accepted after peer review, would disclose the editor's role and for which 30 days is okay for the revision and other stages of a good research work. There is an implicit contract with the authors that the paper will be accepted in the next round, provided the authors respond to the review team comments in good faith. So if you think only one of the reviewer may have given you a major revision then you’re pretty close to crossing the line. Minor revision required: The paper is probably publishable, but needs some minor revisions before a final decision can The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor Only'' -> reject. Rosenkrantz and Harisinghani also found that the more By default, reviewers who request major revisions or recommend rejection will be sent the revised manuscript. So I'm wondering which one this response is. For this, while submitting the cover letter (to the Jun 2, 2022 · Congratulations. May 20, 2015 · Now it seems to be the severity of the revisions required. Key points of the guidelines update: Version 12. Sep 10, 2024 · I am an independent researcher seeking constructive feedback on a paper I recently submitted to a journal. Nov 25, 2015 · Request PDF | On Nov 25, 2015, Markus Lenski and others published Major revision | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Apr 7, 2018 · I'm not entirely sure from the question whether you still have this unexpected result after performing your major revision. The types of issues leading to “Major Revision” include, but are not limited to, the following: The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage Sep 9, 2018 · After second revision (minor), I felt that the title was too long. On assessing the number of comments/queries from the reviewers (>80), the complexity of most of the queries, and the extent of revision required, the author decided not to revise and resubmit to the same journal, which was one of the most prestigious journals in the field. But even when I got the “full revision” or “major revision” message followed by a list of 10 instructions about how to resubmit the revised manuscript, I viewed this as an eventual acceptance after revising with the reviewers suggestions and concerns in mind. The editor has marked it as major revision and said that we should address the novelty issue. Usually, a reviewer response will involve addressing each of the reviewer’s comments and specifying where in the manuscript the changes were made. Oct 1, 2012 · To my experience, major revision in general leads to the acceptance of a manuscript reviewed and re-reviewed for several rounds. All reviewers can access the most recent version of the manuscript via SuSy. My question is how long the revision will take? Because only one reviewer is Decision Types Accept - No further revision required. Do I have to do another similarity check? Just thinking back the past decade, I've had about 90 publication submissions. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. I have 4 published SCI-indexed journals (Elsevier, Springer, IEEE transaction, World Scientific) and 2 more journals communicated (all first authors). (We had four reviewers. 14th Oct, 2022. When recommending major revision, the reviewer should be willing to conduct a re-review of the revised manuscript (Citation 5, Citation 14). Sabah and others published Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Oct 21, 2019 · Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. I remember the first time I got a major revision I sort of panicked too, but from my experience this is totally unnecessary! So congratulations, enjoy the moment and, go make that rebuttal! Dear Jonathan Álvarez Ariza in most of the quality journals, major corrections for the first revision has become a "norm" and the editor response is almost always a standard text as you received Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. 0 on the Revision Smart Form asks teams whether the revision they are submitting is a minor revision or a major revision. In particular, suborbital investigations require a preliminary Payload Requirements Document (PRD) be uploaded along with the mandatory Notice of Intent and a final PRD be uploaded along with the proposal. After contacting him, I was told that he I submitted my manuscript to one of the famous X journal last year. Hello everyone, so my research paper was reviewed with a request for 'major revision' (Q1 journal, related to biomedical engineering). Your article has a chance of being accepted, but the reviewers have requested substantial changes to be made. Jun 17, 2023 · My research field is pure mathematics. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Jun 1, 2021 · It is important to note that the “Major Revision” decision is entitled “Provisional Acceptance Pending Major Revision” for AJNR, suggesting that reviewer recommendations and Senior Editor decisions with this designation imply acceptance at the outset, in contrast to other journals. 3 APRA about Suborbital/suborbital-class investigations. They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. Now, the manuscript is 'Under Review'. It might involve restructuring the paper, adding substantial Submitting a research paper to an academic journal is an important step for any researcher. Now, again it Dec 1, 2022 · PDF | On Dec 1, 2022, Shiraz A. 0 of the European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines 2021. I put off reading the reviews until later that day or the next. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. In the minor revision, I was asked to do nothing other than to include a future research direction in the end after the conclusion. After submitting, you will often receive feedback from peer reviewers. 2022;23:849–858. Major Revision. Major revision required: The paper may or may not be publishable; a major revision is needed before a final decision can be made. As you can guess from the topic question, i had submitted my manuscript and i got major revisions from one reviewer (only one is assigned). It | Find, read and Apr 11, 2022 · Considered a major revision of the book, it was announced to the Christian Science field by means of an article in the January 1886 Christian Science Journal. A: Major revision should not become the default choice for borderline papers and should be used only if without major revisions the paper would be rejected, while a properly done major revision, which addresses the reviewers’ concerns, could make the paper acceptable for publication; if the requested changes are doable in 6 weeks and are Nov 12, 2020 · Months later I received a "Minor Revision". However, even if the deadline is 3 months later, the authors should try to resubmit the revised manuscript at the earliest possible date . After a month in peer review, i received comments of FIVE reviewers with a message from the academic editor that it needed a Major revision as reviewers had serious issues with the manuscript. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. Major Revision The manuscript is viewed as appropriate for CTRJ but there are major concerns with the manuscript that Nov 8, 2015 · The scope of the journal is related to education. Apr 9, 2014 · Most journals will assign a decision of major revision if at least one of the reviewers think that major work is needed (this link gives a good idea about how the final decision is made). 13268 Members of the EACS Guidelines Panels and Governing Board are listed in the Acknowledgements in Appendix 1 Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. Jun 24, 2014 · Case: An author, who was one of our clients, received reviewers’ comments requesting major revision. Now, again it Revising isn’t the first step in the process of writing a research paper, but it is perhaps the most important. Minor Revision. However, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. doi: 10. For each of these levels, revision can be thought of as a series of small, more specific tasks. Even a decision of minor Major Revision is great news! Pretty much everybody in the labs that I work in has major/minor revisions. Of these, I estimate that five were rejected (either desk rejected or reviewed and rejected). In fact, if you don’t get a desk reject, then major revisions is the most common decision to expect. Feb 28, 2023 · I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Giving the best answer to this question is important because major revisions to studies that have been heard by the Full […] Major revision. Now, again it Jan 19, 2017 · My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. 0 and 11. So, I shortened the title that does not change the intention of the paper. Mar 13, 2022 · I just finished a major revision for one of my research papers. ) or for a special series Conditional acceptance pending major revision: Once the article has been revised, it may be sent out for peer review again to the same or different reviewers. mte hjt srwt gcmad uhx ccreg kjjw cclrkdk bzeyr wjkxnnr